Research: 2016 EU referendum result could have been different if access to Higher Education was greater

Heat map showing access to Higher Education in England and Wales is available here:

https://public.tableau.com/views/2_5_1/2_5HE?:embed=y&:display_count=yes

Visualisation of correlation between access to Higher Education and Leave votes in England and Wales is available here:

https://public.tableau.com/views/2_3_6/2_3ScatterHE?:embed=y&:display_count=yes

Copies of this paper are available to credentialed journalists upon request; please contact Elsevier’s Newsroom at newsroom@elsevier.com or +31 20 485 2492

LEICESTER, 11-Aug-2017 — /EuropaWire/ — Greater access to Higher Education could have reversed the result of the 2016 EU referendum, according to new research from the University of Leicester.

The paper, published in the journal World Development, suggests that access to Higher Education was the ‘predominant factor’ dividing those who voted Remain and those who voted Leave.

The research also suggests that greater access to higher and further education can produce different political outcomes – which has been demonstrated in the 2017 General Election, where it can be argued that voting populations with a higher education had a decisive effect on the result.

The research applied Multivariate Regression Analysis combined with a Logit Model to the real data to identify statistically significant factors that have influenced voting preference simultaneously as well as the odds ratio in favour of Leave.

Among the key findings of the paper are that:

  • An increase of about 3% of British adults accessing to higher education in England and Wales could have reversed the referendum result;
  • A decrease of about 7% in turnout in England and Wales could have also changed the result of the referendum;
  • The factor of elderly voters, although having an effect on the outcome, was generally over reported as a dominant factor;
  • Sex is found to be a statistically significant factor while British born proportions and local income levels are insignificant factors.

Dr Aihua Zhang, from the University of Leicester’s Department of Mathematics, said: “The EU referendum raised significant debate and speculation of the intention of the electorate and its motivations in voting. Much of this debate was informed by simple data analysis examining individual factors, in isolation, and using opinion polling data.

“This, in the case of the EU referendum where multiple factors influence the decision simultaneously, failed to predict the eventual outcome. On June 23rd 2016, Britain’s vote to leave the EU came as a surprise to most observers, with a bigger voter turnout – 72.2% – than that of any UK general election in the past decade.”

The research also suggests that areas in England and Wales with a lower unemployment rate tended to have a higher turnout to support Leave while areas in Scotland and Northern Ireland with a higher proportion of university-educated British people have a higher turnout to support Remain.

The paper, ‘New findings on Key Factors Influencing the UK’s Referendum on Leaving the EU’, is published in World Development. The DOI of the article is 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.07.017

ENDS

Notes to editors:

For more information contact Dr Aihua Zhang on email az90@leicester.ac.uk

About World Development

World Development is a multi-disciplinary monthly journal of development studies. It seeks to explore ways of improving standards of living, and the human condition generally, by examining potential solutions to problems such as: poverty, unemployment, malnutrition, disease, lack of shelter, discrimination and militarism and civil conflict.

SOURCE: University of Leicester

MEDIA CONTACT

T: +44(0)116 252 5761
E: pressoffice@le.ac.uk
Out of hours: +44(0)7711 927821

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *