Brussels, 3-5-2013 — /europawire.eu/ — A total of €230 million of EU agricultural policy funds, unduly spent by Member States, is being claimed back by the European Commission today under the so-called clearance of accounts procedure. However, because some of these amounts have already been recovered from the Member States the financial impact of today’s decision will be some €227 million. This money returns to the EU budget because of non-compliance with EU rules or inadequate control procedures on agricultural expenditure. Member States are responsible for paying out and checking expenditure under the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), and the Commission is required to ensure that Member States have made correct use of the funds.
Main financial corrections
Under this latest decision, funds will be recovered from 14 Member States: Belgium, Czech Republic, Germany, Ireland, Greece, Spain, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, Slovakia and the United Kingdom. The most significant individual corrections are:
Background
Member States are responsible for managing most CAP payments, mainly via their paying agencies. They are also in charge of controls, for example verifying the farmer’s claims for direct payments. The Commission carries out over 100 audits every year, verifying that Member State controls and responses to shortcomings are sufficient, and has the power to claw back funds in arrears if the audits show that Member State management and control is not good enough to guarantee that EU funds have been spent properly.
For details on how the clearance of annual accounts system works, see MEMO/12/109 and the factsheet “Managing the agriculture budget wisely”, available on the internet at: http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/fin/clearance/factsheet_en.pdf.
Details of the individual corrections, by Member State and by sector, are given in the tables attached (annexes I and II).
Contacts :Fanny Dabertrand (+32 2 299 06 25) Roger Waite (+32 2 296 14 04) |
Annex I : Conformity clearance of accounts of EAGF and EAFRD
Decision 41: Corrections by Member state (In Million €)
Sector and reason for correction | Amount of correction | Amount of financial impact of the correction2 | |||
Belgium | |||||
Other corrections – correction proposed for exceeding of financial ceilings | 0.595 | 0.595 | |||
Czech Republic | |||||
Other corrections – correction proposed for exceeding of financial ceilings | 0.027 | 0.027 | |||
Germany | |||||
Rural development – correction proposed for lack of 100% verification of the parcels for Agri-environment measure | 0.340 | 0.340 | |||
Other corrections – correction proposed for errors found during the financial clearance of accounts for 2009 | 0.935 | 0.935 | |||
Spain | |||||
Livestock Premiums – correction proposed for insufficient rate of on-the-spot checks for bovine and ovine and for incorrect application of sanctions | 0.196 | 0.196 | |||
Cross-compliance – correction proposed for deficiencies in sanctioning system, 1 good agricultural and environmental condition (GAEC) missing and partial coverage of 2 statutory management requirements (SMR) | 0.991 | 0.990 | |||
UK | |||||
Animal premium – correction proposed for weaknesses in identification of animals by management tags only, absence of reaction in terms of increase of numbers of on-the-spot checks, frequent announcement of on-the-spot checks more than 48h in advance | 10.348 | 10.348 | |||
Rural Development – correction proposed for deficiencies in the scope of the on-the-spot checks, controllability and risk analysis | 1.930 | 0.001 | |||
Other corrections – correction proposed for late payments and exceeding of financial ceiling | 0.322 | -0.277 | |||
Greece | |||||
Fruits & Vegetables – correction proposed for non-compliant reduction of the minimum yield for the dried grapes | 83.613 | 83.613 | |||
Livestock premiums – correction proposed for weaknesses in on the spot checks and delays in I&R database updates for bovine | 9.403 | 8.900 | |||
Livestock premiums – correction proposed for weaknesses in flock registers and on-the-spot checks for ovine | 23.956 | 23.883 | |||
Rural Development – correction proposed for weaknesses in on-the-spot controls | 6.175 | 6.175 | |||
Other corrections – reimbursement following the judgement issued in case T-158/09 | 0.821 | 0.821 | |||
Hungary | |||||
Other corrections – correction proposed for exceeding of financial ceiling | 0.001 | 0.000 | |||
Ireland | |||||
Cross-compliance – correction proposed for 2 missing GAECs and incorrect application of sanctions | 1.899 | 1.899 | |||
Lithuania | |||||
Rural development – correction proposed for weaknesses in the on-the-spot controls | 3.449 | 3.449 | |||
Malta | |||||
Area Aids – correction proposed for weaknesses in the establishment of the payment entitlements | 0.092 | 0.091 | |||
Poland | |||||
Rural development – correction proposed for deficiencies in the check of the initial application and in the approval of the business plan for the Semi-subsistence farms measure | 79.903 | 79.903 | |||
Rural development – correction proposed for weaknesses in sanction system and lack of verification of 100% of parcels for Agri-environment measure | 1.922 | 1.922 | |||
Other corrections – correction proposed for unaccounted recoveries found during the financial clearance of accounts for 2010 | 0.680 | 0.680 | |||
Portugal | |||||
Export Refunds and Sugar CMO – correction proposed for weaknesses in the selection of the export declarations for the physical checks | 0.031 | 0.031 | |||
Slovenia | |||||
Rural development – correction proposed for deficiencies in the administrative checks for the Natural Handicaps measure | 0.554 | 0.554 | |||
Slovakia | |||||
Rural development – correction proposed for lack of timing of on-the-spot controls and lack of cross checks for livestock verification for the Agri-environment measure | 1.139 | 1.139 | |||
Rural development – lack of verification of minimum standards for animal welfare | 0.401 | 0.401 | |||
Other corrections – correction proposed for financial error in the EAFRD accounts found during the financial clearance of accounts for 2010 | 1.764 | 1.764 | |||
TOTAL | 229.844 | 226.738 |
Annex II : Clearance of accounts of EAGF and EAFRD
Decision 41: Corrections by Sector (In Million €)
Sector | Amount of correction | Amount of financial impact of the correction3 | ||
Export refunds | 0.031 | 0.031 | ||
Fruit and Vegetables | 83.613 | 83.613 | ||
Livestock premiums | 43.903 | 43.327 | ||
Area aid | 0.092 | 0.091 | ||
Cross-compliance | 2.890 | 2.890 | ||
Rural development | 95.812 | 93.884 | ||
Other corrections | 3.503 | 2.903 | ||
TOTAL | 229.844 | 226.739 |
The financial impact is lower due to amounts already recovered from or paid back by the Member State.
Financial impact of the correction is taking into account the previous overlapping corrections and amounts already recovered by the European Commission
Financial impact of the correction is taking into account the previous overlapping corrections and amounts already recovered by the European Commission
(IN BRIEF) Evonik has enhanced its capabilities for RESOMER® powder biomaterials at its Darmstadt site…
(IN BRIEF) PUMA Hoops and LaMelo Ball have teamed up to unveil the LaFrancé, their…
(IN BRIEF) PUMA, in collaboration with the Mercedes-AMG PETRONAS Formula One Team, introduces a groundbreaking…
(IN BRIEF) FORVIA HELLA GmbH & Co. KGaA, in its Annual General Meeting held on…
(IN BRIEF) Energiekontor AG, a prominent German project developer and operator of wind and solar…
(IN BRIEF) DWS has been honored with multiple prestigious awards at recent industry ceremonies, showcasing…